What the researchers say

This work deserves the most serious consideration.
“The claim can be plausibly made that the potential impact of this research exceeds that of any other ongoing social or psychological research program. The research has survived a broader array of statistical tests than most research in the field of conflict resolution. I think this work, and the theory that informs it, deserve the most serious consideration by academics and policy makers alike.”
David Edwards, Ph.D., Professor of Government
at the University of Texas at Austin

We have to take these studies seriously.
“In the studies that I have examined on the impact of the Maharishi Effect [the Invincible Defense Technology] on conflict, I can find no methodological flaws, and the findings have been consistent across a large number of replications in many different geographical and conflictual situations. As unlikely as the premise may sound, I think we have to take these studies seriously.”
Ted Robert Gurr, Ph.D., Emeritus Professor of Government
and Politics at the University of Maryland

The work is sound.
“The hypothesis definitely raised some eyebrows among our reviewers. But the statistical work is sound. The numbers are there. When you can statistically control for as many variables as these studies do, it makes the results much more convincing. This evidence indicates that we now have a new technology to generate peace in the world.”
Raymond Russ, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology at the
University of Maine; editor, Journal of Mind and Behavior

This research demands action.
“I have been following the research on the Maharishi Effect as it has developed over the last twenty years. There is now a strong and coherent body of evidence showing that [this approach] provides a simple and cost-effective solution to many of the social problems we face today. This research and its conclusions are so strong, that it demands action from those responsible for government policy.”
Huw Dixon, Ph.D., Professor of Economics
at York University, England

Doesnt require any intrusive intervention to resolve conflict
“The advantage of this approach to conflict resolution is that it doesn’t require any intrusive intervention to resolve the conflict. It appears to make use of a fundamental level of interconnectedness among all members of the community to reduce stress and create coherence in the conflict area.”
 —John Davies, Ph.D., Research Coordinator for the Center of International Development and Conflict Management at the University of Maryland